TY - JOUR
T1 - Trends of robotic-assisted surgery for thyroid, colorectal, stomach and hepatopancreaticobiliary cancer
T2 - 10 year Korea trend investigation
AU - for the Korean Association of Robotic Surgeons (KAROS) Study Group
AU - An, Liang
AU - Hwang, Kyo Sun
AU - Park, Shin Hoo
AU - Kim, You Na
AU - Baek, Se Jin
AU - Park, Sungsoo
AU - Hyung, Woo Jin
AU - Chung, Woung Youn
AU - Kim, Seon Hahn
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020
PY - 2021/1
Y1 - 2021/1
N2 - Background: The current position of robotic surgery in the field of minimally invasive surgery remains ambiguous. We evaluated long-term trends of robotic general surgery and the future direction of its development. Methods: Data on robotic cancer surgeries between 2005 and 2014 were retrospectively collected by volunteer institutions in the Republic of Korea. Spearman's correlation and logistic regression analyses were used to compare robotic and laparoscopic surgery trends in general surgery. Results: The odds that robotic surgery was performed instead of laparoscopic surgery significantly decreased in the fields of colorectal, stomach, and hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery (odds ratio [OR]: 0.95, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.93–0.97; OR: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.88–0.92; and OR: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.65–0.78, respectively), except for thyroid surgery (OR: 1.28, 95% CI: 1.25–1.30). Of the total numbers of each procedure, proportions of robotic intersphincteric resections, abdominoperineal resections, and pylorus-preserving surgery performed significantly increased (r = 0.98, P < .001; r = 0.78, P = .01; and r = 0.86, P = .007, respectively). Conclusions: The use of robotic surgery failed to preponderate that of laparoscopic surgery, except for thyroid surgery. Robotic surgery is increasingly preferred for limited fields or complex surgeries, but the use of robotics in simple surgeries has decreased.
AB - Background: The current position of robotic surgery in the field of minimally invasive surgery remains ambiguous. We evaluated long-term trends of robotic general surgery and the future direction of its development. Methods: Data on robotic cancer surgeries between 2005 and 2014 were retrospectively collected by volunteer institutions in the Republic of Korea. Spearman's correlation and logistic regression analyses were used to compare robotic and laparoscopic surgery trends in general surgery. Results: The odds that robotic surgery was performed instead of laparoscopic surgery significantly decreased in the fields of colorectal, stomach, and hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery (odds ratio [OR]: 0.95, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.93–0.97; OR: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.88–0.92; and OR: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.65–0.78, respectively), except for thyroid surgery (OR: 1.28, 95% CI: 1.25–1.30). Of the total numbers of each procedure, proportions of robotic intersphincteric resections, abdominoperineal resections, and pylorus-preserving surgery performed significantly increased (r = 0.98, P < .001; r = 0.78, P = .01; and r = 0.86, P = .007, respectively). Conclusions: The use of robotic surgery failed to preponderate that of laparoscopic surgery, except for thyroid surgery. Robotic surgery is increasingly preferred for limited fields or complex surgeries, but the use of robotics in simple surgeries has decreased.
KW - Laparoscopic cancer surgery
KW - Minimally invasive treatment
KW - Robotic cancer surgery
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85086923427&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.asjsur.2020.05.029
DO - 10.1016/j.asjsur.2020.05.029
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85086923427
SN - 1015-9584
VL - 44
SP - 199
EP - 205
JO - Asian Journal of Surgery
JF - Asian Journal of Surgery
IS - 1
ER -