Vaccinia-based oncolytic immunotherapy Pexastimogene Devacirepvec in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma after sorafenib failure: a randomized multicenter Phase IIb trial (TRAVERSE)

  • M. Moehler*
  • , J. Heo
  • , H. C. Lee
  • , W. Y. Tak
  • , Y. Chao
  • , S. W. Paik
  • , H. J. Yim
  • , K. S. Byun
  • , A. Baron
  • , G. Ungerechts
  • , D. Jonker
  • , L. Ruo
  • , M. Cho
  • , A. Kaubisch
  • , H. Wege
  • , P. Merle
  • , O. Ebert
  • , F. Habersetzer
  • , J. F. Blanc
  • , Olivier Rosmorduc
  • R. Lencioni, R. Patt, A. M. Leen, F. Foerster, M. Homerin, N. Stojkowitz, M. Lusky, J. M. Limacher, M. Hennequi, N. Gaspar, B. McFadden, N. De Silva, D. Shen, A. Pelusio, D. H. Kirn, C. J. Breitbach, J. M. Burke
*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    110 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Pexastimogene devacirepvec (Pexa-Vec) is a vaccinia virus-based oncolytic immunotherapy designed to preferentially replicate in and destroy tumor cells while stimulating anti-tumor immunity by expressing GM-CSF. An earlier randomized Phase IIa trial in predominantly sorafenib-naïve hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) demonstrated an overall survival (OS) benefit. This randomized, open-label Phase IIb trial investigated whether Pexa-Vec plus Best Supportive Care (BSC) improved OS over BSC alone in HCC patients who failed sorafenib therapy (TRAVERSE). 129 patients were randomly assigned 2:1 to Pexa-Vec plus BSC vs. BSC alone. Pexa-Vec was given as a single intravenous (IV) infusion followed by up to 5 IT injections. The primary endpoint was OS. Secondary endpoints included overall response rate (RR), time to progression (TTP) and safety. A high drop-out rate in the control arm (63%) confounded assessment of response-based endpoints. Median OS (ITT) for Pexa-Vec plus BSC vs. BSC alone was 4.2 and 4.4 months, respectively (HR, 1.19, 95% CI: 0.78–1.80; p =.428). There was no difference between the two treatment arms in RR or TTP. Pexa-Vec was generally well-tolerated. The most frequent Grade 3 included pyrexia (8%) and hypotension (8%). Induction of immune responses to vaccinia antigens and HCC associated antigens were observed. Despite a tolerable safety profile and induction of T cell responses, Pexa-Vec did not improve OS as second-line therapy after sorafenib failure. The true potential of oncolytic viruses may lie in the treatment of patients with earlier disease stages which should be addressed in future studies. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01387555.

    Original languageEnglish
    Article numbere1615817
    JournalOncoImmunology
    Volume8
    Issue number8
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2019

    Bibliographical note

    Publisher Copyright:
    © 2019, © 2019 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.

    Keywords

    • Hepatocellular carcinoma
    • Pexa-Vec
    • oncolytic immunotherapy
    • oncolytic vaccinia
    • sorafenib

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Immunology and Allergy
    • Immunology
    • Oncology

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Vaccinia-based oncolytic immunotherapy Pexastimogene Devacirepvec in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma after sorafenib failure: a randomized multicenter Phase IIb trial (TRAVERSE)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this