Willingness to pay for reduced risk of foodborne illness: A nonhypothetical field experiment

Rodolfo M. Nayga, Richard Woodward, Wipon Aiew

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    54 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This paper focuses on estimating willingness to pay for reducing risk of getting foodborne illness using a nonhypothetical field experiment utilizing real food products (i.e., ground beef), real cash, and actual exchange in a market setting. Respondents were given information about the nature of food irradiation. Single-bounded and one and one-half bounded models are developed using dichotomous choice experiments. Our results indicate that individuals are willing to pay for a reduction in the risk of foodborne illness once informed about the nature of food irradiation. Our respondents are willing to pay a premium of about $0.77 for a pound of irradiated ground beef, which is higher than the cost to irradiate the product.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)461-475
    Number of pages15
    JournalCanadian Journal of Agricultural Economics
    Volume54
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2006 Dec

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Global and Planetary Change
    • Ecology
    • Animal Science and Zoology
    • Agronomy and Crop Science
    • Economics and Econometrics

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Willingness to pay for reduced risk of foodborne illness: A nonhypothetical field experiment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this